College Football Playoff (CFP) committee has once again found itself embroiled in controversy following its release of the final rankings for the 2024 season. Tennessee, a team many believed had a compelling case for inclusion, was notably left out, sparking outrage among fans and analysts alike.

 

The Volunteers, who finished the regular season with an impressive record and marquee wins over highly ranked opponents, were viewed as a strong candidate for one of the coveted playoff spots. Tennessee boasted a balanced team, featuring a dynamic offense and a stout defense that proved resilient against top competition. Their resume included victories over conference powerhouses, which should have solidified their position among the nation’s elite.

 

Critics of the CFP committee argue that Tennessee’s exclusion points to a larger issue with the ranking process. The committee has long emphasized criteria such as strength of schedule, head-to-head matchups, and conference championships. However, the final rankings have led many to question how consistently these metrics are applied. Tennessee’s impressive performances against high-caliber opponents appear to have been undervalued, especially in comparison to teams that secured playoff spots despite weaker resumes or notable losses.

 

Adding fuel to the fire is the perception that the committee prioritized brand recognition and marketability over merit. Tennessee, a storied program with a passionate fanbase, seemed to have checked every box required for playoff contention. Instead, their exclusion has led many to accuse the CFP committee of perpetuating a system that favors perennial powerhouses and conferences with political clout over emerging contenders.

 

For Tennessee fans, the snub is particularly bitter given the team’s efforts to rise above preseason expectations. The Volunteers showcased a program on the rise, with dynamic players and coaching decisions that earned widespread praise throughout the season. Head coach Josh Heupel expressed disappointment but urged his players to focus on their upcoming bowl game, which still provides an opportunity to showcase their talent on a national stage.

 

The CFP committee’s decision has reignited calls for an expanded playoff format. Proponents argue that a larger field would reduce the subjectivity of the current system and allow more teams to prove their worth on the field. While the 12-team playoff set to debut in 2025 offers hope for the future, it comes too late for Tennessee and other teams that feel wronged by this year’s rankings.

 

As fans and analysts debate the fairness of the CFP process, one thing is clear: the exclusion of Tennessee has cast a shadow over the final rankings, leaving many to wonder if the playoff truly reflects the best of college football.