LSU head coach Brian Kelly has strongly rejected recent accusations made by the father of former player Greg Brooks Jr. regarding neglect and mistreatment during his time with the Tigers. The allegations surfaced when Brooks’ father, Greg Brooks Sr., voiced his concerns publicly, claiming that LSU’s coaching staff, under Kelly, had failed to provide proper care for his son, particularly during a health crisis that led to Brooks Jr.’s departure from the team. Kelly, however, vehemently denied these accusations, calling them “factually incorrect.”
Brooks Jr., a standout defensive back for LSU, transferred to the university from Arkansas in 2023 and made a significant impact on the team’s defense. However, his time at LSU took an unexpected turn when he was diagnosed with a medical condition that required urgent attention. In a statement, Brooks Sr. alleged that the coaching staff, led by Kelly, was negligent in providing adequate care and support to his son during this period.
In response, Brian Kelly released a detailed statement refuting these claims. The LSU head coach emphasized the university’s commitment to the well-being of all student-athletes, noting that Brooks Jr. was provided with the best possible medical care and support throughout his time at LSU. Kelly further asserted that the coaching staff had been in regular communication with Brooks’ family and had taken all necessary steps to address any concerns raised about the player’s health.
“I take these allegations very seriously, but they are simply not true,” Kelly said. “Our first priority is always the safety and well-being of our players. Greg Brooks Jr. was treated with the utmost respect and care, both on and off the field. Any suggestion to the contrary is misleading and does not reflect the environment we work hard to create at LSU.”
Kelly’s statement went on to clarify that the LSU medical staff, including doctors and specialists, had been actively involved in Brooks Jr.’s care. The player was reportedly monitored closely, and any necessary treatment or medical intervention was promptly addressed. Additionally, Kelly emphasized that the football program maintains an open line of communication with families, ensuring they are well-informed about their children’s health and welfare.
Despite the coach’s rebuttal, Brooks Sr. maintained that LSU’s actions fell short of what he believed was necessary to properly care for his son during a critical time. He argued that the situation could have been handled differently and expressed his dissatisfaction with the response he received from the university’s athletic department.
The controversy has added an unexpected layer of tension to an otherwise successful LSU football program, which is gearing up for a highly anticipated season. Kelly’s leadership, however, appears firm as he reiterates the program’s commitment to its athletes’ health and well-being, aiming to move past this disagreement while continuing to focus on team goals and player development. The dispute, while significant, has not detracted from LSU’s efforts to maintain a strong, supportive environment for its student-athletes.